STAGE 1A

For the scoring mechanism that will be used to assess the Stage 1A questionnaire, please refer to the guidance notes accompanying Wandsworth Council's questionnaire.

Please note that competitors will be expected to achieve a mark of 3 or more for each of the three case study examples that they submit.  When selecting the three case study projects, competitors are reminded that 'similar services' means projects where the team has addressed and resolved similar design and/or delivery challenges to those inherent in the Nine Elms to Pimlico Bridge Project. 

STAGE 1B

STAGE 2

The detailed scoring criteria that will be used for Stage 2 will be explained in the Stage 2 brief; it will embrace both cost and quality criteria.  Broadly, it is expected that the key issues will be:

• The design idea
• The team’s technical competency
• The team’s communication skills with the client, stakeholders and with the public
• Response to and compliance with the technical brief
• Response to programme and cost issues
• Fee